
28:24
who seconded?

28:38
Michael Sandvig

28:45
Thank you

46:21
We may need to look at how any of the items dealing with mental health holds would be impacted by pending legislation.

01:22:10
There are policies on the Idaho exchange that specifically exclude MH coverage.

01:23:57
I have to step out for just a moment.

01:27:38
I have a conflicting 2 PM meeting, sorry.

01:27:44
Very interesting, Dr. Fox!

01:55:29
I will have to jump off at 3:30pm for another meeting. FYI

01:58:26
apologies- some of our action items that are labeled treatment are actually infrastructure.

02:00:40
Reminder ofSMART GOALSS - SpecificM - MeasurableA - AchievableR - RelevantT - Time-bound

02:00:45
Mental Health parity / payment seems important to increasing the number of professionals in Idaho. If fees are a barrier to practice, not being paid is a bigger barrier to practice.

02:03:36
Toni, I think you'll see that provider reimbursement topic in Infrastructure #3

02:10:15
If we are looking for specific, the word provider is vague. It is not clear if we mean therapist, psychiatrists, peer support, etc

02:20:01
What Adrian said is what I am thinking

02:26:45
Will anything need legislative approval?

02:34:50
So many needed services in the Behavioral Health area don't have an official CPT code - go unpaid. Or they are not paid at parity with physical medicine.

02:35:35
. . . practices to provide competitive and fair reimbursement rates and processes that increases value-based services . .

02:36:38
Janice - I see you just types the same thing I just said. Great minds think alike.

02:43:49
Is MH parity a separate recommendation?

02:44:20
Are we really talking about reimbursable codes and reimbursement rates?

02:44:33
instead of enforce, what if we used the word "address"?

02:46:05
I apologize but I have to step out early due to my court schedule today.

02:47:08
Implement is a good choice. Softer, but direct.

02:49:08
i am stepping out now. Great working with everyone!

02:51:07
To my knowledge, Telehealth is software. Like Bandaid vs adhesive strip. Virtual care or something might be better.

02:52:48
As soon as insurance no longer covers virtual services, providers won't offer them. At least that is what my provider is saying.

02:53:02
I agree. The terminology has been moving toward virtual care rather than tele...

02:55:31
Sorry, I have to step away for another meeting.

02:59:18
If you look at the telehealth council reccomendations, I think they had something very similar. You might be able to use some of their language as a model. It would be good to have some consistency there.

03:05:05
hi Folks,

03:05:11
I agree with Dr B

03:06:32
yes....

03:06:36
sounds good to me

03:08:56
Identify a method for sharing critical data across agencies to facilitate care coordination.

03:08:58
Later change #5 to care coordination instead of we would like . . .

03:09:57
:)

03:10:03
We’re making great progress. I apologize but I have to jump off as I have a phone appointment in a couple minutes for an upcoming hearing.

03:10:58
Yes and 3 years because it will require legislation as well

03:11:52
thumbs up

03:12:22
Yes

03:12:22
agreed

03:16:21
in communities

03:19:00
Yes

03:19:12
This is the general population of Idaho

03:19:57
1 year

03:20:20
There seems to be a disconnect between the stated recommendation and the action items

03:22:58
It seems like a subgroup could be a good use of resources and time.

03:23:26
Sounds like Friday and Monday for subgroup meetings.

03:25:15
The 20th meeting is 3 to 5. Should it be 1 to 5? Can that be done?

03:28:08
I can join at 2

03:30:29
thanks all